Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Leigh Stein's avatar

I think about that Ira Glass quote a lot about the time in your development as an artist when your skill level isn't yet as good as your taste. And I think a lot of querying writers don't realize their book isn't good enough to compete with the others, but it's more of a comfort to say "the system is broken" than to realize, wow I just spent years writing this book and I learned a lot but I may have to get better in order to break in. There are just so many other writers who have the same dream. And we're told not to look at other writers as our "competition" but as our "community." It actually is a competition!

Expand full comment
Sam Kahn's avatar

Nice post Andrew, but I think there's another way to look at it. The way it works now, the entire status system for writing is controlled not by writers, not by regular readers, not by people who have the best interests of literature necessarily at heart, but by people who are looking to make a buck by packaging a book as a commodity. There's nothing wrong with that per se but the system emerged out of very different material conditions, where the distribution of content had to pass through the expensive medium of the print shop. Now that that's really no longer the case, the same publishing companies nonetheless still act as though they are the sole credible evaluators of literary merit. All of this is a highly unnatural and antiquated system. It creates chokeblocks in the ability of writers to find their audiences, and those chokeblocks often last for the entirety of people's careers - the vast, vast majority of writers (this is still the case) spend their lives chewing their elbows in frustration, being broke, thinking they're inadequate, and all because some agent didn't answer their email. This is not a good state of affairs and it is no longer really necessary. Writers have every right to be frustrated and angry about it.

Expand full comment
21 more comments...

No posts